🔗 Share this article

Via an unsigned order, the nation's top court has allowed Texas to use a revised congressional district plan that may create as many as five new Republican-leaning districts. The six-to-three decision, released on Thursday, grants a appeal by the state to set aside a lower court's injunction that had rejected the redistricting plan in November.

Court's Rationale

The lower court erroneously placed itself into an ongoing primary campaign, causing much confusion and disrupting the sensitive federal-state balance in elections, the order stated in explaining its decision.

The federal court had previously found that Texas had likely classified voters by their race – a act known as illegal race-based districting – when it enacted the redistricting plan. It had ordered the state to revert to the boundaries drawn after the 2020 census for the upcoming election.

Sharp Dissent

With a forcefully written dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan criticized the majority's action. She stated that it disregarded the work of the district court, noting that its decision was crafted by a judge selected by ex-President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan argued in a opinion co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, This court's stay guarantees that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its enhanced favoritism, will govern next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas citizens, without justification, will be placed in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced repeatedly, is a infraction of the law of the land.

National Map-Drawing Battle

This decision comes amid a nationwide contest over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in campaigns to transform the U.S. House map to secure a slim Republican majority. Ordinarily, map-drawing happens after a ten-year survey. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a brazen off-cycle redistricting earlier this year set off a chain reaction among other states.

Republicans in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted new maps that are estimated to yield a number of additional Republican-leaning seats. Democrats, in response, have countered with their own plans in including California and Virginia, which might neutralize those projected gains.

Partisan Reactions

The Texas top lawyer hailed the supreme court ruling. In a statement, he said the order protected Texas's prerogative to draw a map that guarantees electoral outcomes aligned with the GOP. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he added.

In contrast, opposition party representatives decried the decision. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the leader of a major party campaign committee.

Another senior Democratic leader stated the court had yet again shredded its credibility by rubber-stamping a race-based map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he concluded.