🔗 Share this article

Just two days prior to the NYC race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange made a bold forecast – not just the winner overall, but block by block. Lange, a political analyst who grew up in New York City, devoted over a decade in left-leaning activism and emerged as something of a local celebrity recently for his deep dives into city data and polling.

He released his highly detailed forecast map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate would win while missing the independent candidate’s solid showing – on his Substack, the Narrative War. Lange has a flair for witty coinages. He highlighted, for instance, the split between the progressive stronghold, stretching from one neighborhood to another area to a third locale, where he forecasted (accurately) that Mamdani would triumph by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, “the Free Press and financial newspapers surpass the New York Times” in readership and most voters leaned toward Cuomo, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Patterns and Surprises

What was your night?

I had to do that because they were dropping approximately 200K votes into the system frequently! I felt a little nervous initially: Mamdani led the early vote by 12 points, but came two big batches of votes that came in later and his lead went from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

You know, it was possible where yesterday went kind of poorly for him, in which Cuomo would have basically increasing his support from the Democratic primary. However the winner added 500,000 supporters to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he won. He campaigned and massively expanded his base from the first round.

Expanding Support

Where did the mayor-elect get those extra votes from?

He built the alliance that the left always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, it’s young, tenants and individuals facing cost pressures. He improved significantly with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the earlier election. Additionally he boosted his base of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and immigrant groups. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He built the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: diverse, young, renters and people squeezed by affordability

There were also some Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, confined to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Electors in immigrant strongholds that supported Trump last year went for the progressive now. But it’s not that he was winning over white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Impact

A major development of the election was the sky-high participation. Who did that help?

Both sides. Participation was much greater than anticipated. I thought it could exceed two million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – which is a huge number of participants. Existed a substantial opposition group, who were motivated, but his supporters was also motivated, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Currently you would say he’s favored to surpass 50%. He has 50.4% but there’s still around 200K ballots left to report at that time. Thus I don’t think it’s definitive, but I think it’s likely, and I hope he achieves it so then no one can say the Republican was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His vote plummeted.

He didn’t win any district in any area. Not even Tottenville in the borough, which is like an 88% Trump area. That truly was unexpected. The independent kept Caucasian districts, affluent zones and devout communities, and then added all of these Republicans on Staten Island who had a strong turnout. I think occurred a lot of strategic balloting by the Republicans. They were doing it prior to Trump tweeted his support for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome unless the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your much mentioned “commie corridor” – did backing for Mamdani overwhelming in those parts of the boroughs?

I think existed some weakening of the progressive zone in certain places like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, instance, the Greek landlords and homeowners all went for Cuomo. Thus there existed a little resistance. However no, largely the commie corridor is a key factor why Mamdani prevailed – he was polling between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the election we reported on whether the candidate was making inroads with the community. Any indication that he succeeded?

There are neighborhoods with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. But in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance was influential in those places. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned Cuomo. And also, there are newcomers from Eastern Europe in the borough, they were strongly Cuomo. So I don’t know if existed crazy narrative-busters here, but Mamdani retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the another locale by big margins.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what New York represents in politics? Will the progressive base become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that key figures from progressives come from a few areas in the boroughs. I’m sure that there will be more of that – candidates will come from these areas to be elevated nationally.

However I think that each urban center in America can have similar progressive hubs. Cities are the centers of progressive influence in the nation – because they’re young, tenancy is common and they are places where people are crushed by the disparities we face.